Please review my IELTS essay and give me a score on an Ielts scale

Topic: Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people say that there is no point in protecting wild animals due to short of their places. I personally disagree with this point of view because of two main reasons: the first reason is that they have a bad influence on us ad the second one is changing of ecosystems.

If we let wild animals die out, they will impact back on us. Just only because of absurd thought of some people that the Earth have no enough place for them to live, it is going to cause serious consequences. Firstly, wild animals can provide food for human so if we kill them or not to be effort to protect them, human will not have enough food to survive. At another aspect, wild animals and their habitats are crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen and absorb carbon dioxide or stabilize climate. Therefore, protecting wild animals is the fact that we are protecting us.

Equally importantly, by ignoring wild animals, we are indirectly destroying our habitat. Because of the close relationship between each specie so when one food chain disappeared, those next food chain would vanish, too. This lead to the fact that natural habitats are on the verge of danger and the costs of managing the resulting changes out planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals, we maintain the natural balance of all creatures.

In conclusion, we have no right to decide the life of wild animals, and i believe that we are going to find the solution to deal with these difficult problems.