Please review my essay? Thank you so much!:)

Question: It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay:

Some commentators believe that children should study just the history of their own countries or regions rather than world history. From my perspective, I disgree with this viewpoint because it is equally essential for pupils to learn local and global history.

On the one hand, there are several compelling reasons why it is necessary for school kids to learn their national history. First, since knowing about the origins and victorious past of their nations provokes children's patriotism and a sense of belonging, learning local history is trully beneficial. For example, Vienamese pupils are taught about the intense Vietnam war against colonisation, which implies that they can appreciate the liberty and the sacrifies their ancestors made. Second, by gaining knowledge of the history of their motherlands, schoolchildren have the opportunity to draw lessons from what happened in the past. This means that history is full of faults, which can become invaluable lessons for future generations to avoid similar advert outcomes.

However, the importance of learning world history shouldnot be underestimated. Because of the trend towards globalization, it is advantageous for pupils to obtain some understanding of other ethnic groups' origins and past development. As a results, they are likely to have mutual respect for other people. Futhermore, through global history, kids can get an overview of the interrelationship of countries all over the world and how international events have shaped the contemporary world.

In conclusion, I would argue that schoolchildren should pay attention to both local and world history since it offers an array of benefits for them.