Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people assert that studying food science and how to prepare it is superfluous, whereas others say it more beneficial for students to invest most of their time studying core subjects like math and English. My view is that although the knowledge that students can acquire when studying food might not bring their advantages after they graduate, this can become an asset for them to lead a healthy and comfortable life.
Seemingly, one primary reason why some people think that important subjects such as math or English should be absolutely prioritized is that unlike food science and cooking, studying those subjects can provide with students the skills required for their careers. In fact, companies customarily recruit people with good communication and logical thinking skills. This means even though a potential candidate has a magnificent cooking prowess and an impressive command of nutrition, they are not very likely to be employed if they lack these aforementioned abilities and do not follow nutrition or cooking careers. This point can be exemplified with the case of nestle and Unilever companies. In fact, these two companies require potential employees to take IQ and EQ tests, which are absolutely irrelevant to food or cooking. Therefore, it is better for students to completely concentrate on important subjects.
Nonetheless, studying food science and how to cook helps students to live more economically and comfortably. Admittedly, not many people can live with their parents forever. Therefore, if an individual living separately is not armed with essential skills like cooking, they might have to pay a huge amount of money monthly to eat out, which clearly puts pressure on their finances. additionally, with a lack of knowledge about nutrition, people can easily be confronted with health problems. This is because they might inadvertently combine incompatible food with each other, which oftentimes result in a toxic combination. Consequently, they may get food-poisoning or other health-issues. Because of all these, equipping students with life-skills and knowledge like cooking and nutrition is vital.
In conclusion, I side with the opinion that students should learn the science of food and the preparation of it. There are two primary reasons for this. First, it would lead students to a healthier life. Second, if students manage their time sensibly, they can study those “more important” subjects effectively without focusing too much on them.
Some people assert that studying food science and how to prepare it is superfluous, whereas others say it more (ungrammatical) beneficial for students to invest most of their time studying core subjects like math and English. My view is that although the knowledge that students can acquire when studying food might not bring their (wrong pronoun, ungrammatical) advantages after they graduate, this it can become an asset for them to lead a healthy and comfortable life. Seemingly, (wrong usage) one primary reason why some people think that important subjects such as math or English should be absolutely prioritized is that, unlike food science and cooking, studying those subjects can provide with students (ungrammatical.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Some people assert that studying food science and how to prepare it is superfluous, whereas others say it more (ungrammatical) beneficial for students to invest most of their time studying core subjects like math and English. My view is that although the knowledge that students can acquire when studying food might not bring