Please Rectify

Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views.

Working less than customary hours for adolescents is considered valuable among many nations, however, this practice is not approved in many other areas around the world. I believe that the positive aspects of this attitude outweigh its negative ones.

On the one hand, having part-time occupations for youngsters can lead to lower performance and poor grades as they are less likely to have adequate amounts of time for their assignments or extracurricular activities. The second drawback is the probable unfair treatment by the employer which can have a negative impact on their outlook toward the work itself. Most individuals tend to consider the juvenile as if they are inferiors and this would not be an agreeable first impression. Lastly, balancing job and school might cause increased stress. Withstanding tense situations are not that easy for adults let alone the young.

On the other hand, by being employed for reasonable brief amounts of time, teenagers can gain helpful work experiences which are excellent for their future career and their resume. The second advantage of working part-time for the young is that they would learn how to sufficiently manage their funds. The money that have been earned through hard work is usually deemed more precious which lead to spending the resources more wisely. Lastly, the individuals who have worked from their early youth are normally more confident, more independent and more reliable than the ones who never have.

To summarize, I believe having a temporary occupation that involves less hours than a standard one can be favorable for adolescents, and the drawbacks of this practice are overwhelmed by its advantages.