Please modify this essay for me.

# Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

I disagree with that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Because animal resources are unrecoverable and we can select another place to build farmland etc. and protecting endangered animals is protecting human ourself.

## animal resources are unrecoverable.
When one endangered special disappeared, it would never appear again. But our farmland, housing and industry can be rebuilt at any time again. Besides, endangered animals are valuable for scientific research, especially for biology science. From them, we can get a lot of valuable information. But what new knowledge can we get from homing that is just a copy of another one. So we should protect endangered animals, since they are unrecoverable and valuable.
## protecting endangered animals is protecting human ourself.
When a special of endangered animals disappeared from our earth, it would represent that environment had become worse than the time before. The next special would disappear may be human ourself. It sounds scared. But we must realise it. To Protect endangered animals is to protect our environment. Not only endangered animals but also ourself can live in a excellent environment.

## In summary
In summary, saving land for endangered animals are more important than human need for farmland, housing, and industry. We all want our sons and daughters can live in a good environment.