Some people say that art (e.g. painting, music, poetry) can be made by everyone whereas others believe that it can be only made by those with special abilities. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It would be argued by some that every human can have the ability to create masterpieces, such as painting, music, poetry. In my opinion, however, it can be only made by individuals with innate talent.
On the one hand, there is a number of reasons why some think that artworks can be made by people. Firstly, art is taught from primary school to high school, children know how to make some pieces of music, poems or even draw different kinds of paintings, such as oil paintings, scenery ones. Therefore, they can create works of art with the help of instructors. Furthermore, it is also claimed that such talent can be acquired through dogged perseverance. Playing the piano, for example, needs passion and long hours of practice in order to become more adroit and play without error.
On the other hand, I would argue that only people who have a flair for art can depict perfection in every artwork. The first reason is creating art takes a lot of effort and time, therefore, a normal person might not have enough talent to describe the beauty of philosophy hidden inside. For instance, people who were born gifted have astonishing skills of choosing the right angles for their pictures in a nuanced way. Traditionally, it is sometimes believed that not every human can survive in this competitive sector. Someone never can be a successful actor unless he is extremely good at acting.
In conclusion, although some people think that everyone has the right to equal exposure to art, I personally believe that works of art are better as those who have an eye for art make them.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.