Please help me with my writing task 2.

Topic:

People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature such as novels and poems. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that high schools should omit literature from learning programs. I completely disagree with this due to benefits this subjects bringing.

This will be a lack of knowledge if students do not learn literature in high schools. Literature is a additonal subject, which is helpful when students do the research projects in the university. For instance, if pupils didn’t study literature before, they wouldn’t know how to write a scientific paper clearly and logically. Moreover, they finds it more difficult to choose words and phrases with evident meanings. In term of social life, students may feel dull due to the shortage of experience brought from a range of exellent novels and poems.

There are various reasons why a student at high school ought to learn literature during study period. First, it broadens one’s horizons with many kinds of novels such as historical and romantic novels. A poem flourishes the soul with numerous appealing things reducing stress and study pressure. Second, every literature lesson is also a ethical lesson that aid to adjust student behaviors. For example, the novel “Tat Den”, composed by a Vietnamese novelist, shows the empathy with farmers that belonged to this period. Third, literature arouse students the pride about the national cultural identity. Last, students who learned literature know expressing their emotions through poetic lines. In Mother’s Day, they can give their mother self-composed poems to show how their love are.

In conclusion, I believe that literature would be a worthwhile subject that does not have to be moved on for the entire development.