Please help me with my IELTS writing task 2

Topic :

Wild animals have no place in the 21^st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Message body:

Many people argue that it is pointless and wasting money to protect wild animals because they no longer have a place in the 21st century. Personally, I strongly disagree with this point of view.

There are two main reasons why I believe that it is absurd to argue that it is wasting to protect animals in the 21st century. Firstly, I believe a human has no right to destroy or encourage the extinction of any living species. Our planet Earth exists for us to live all together, happily and there is no particular about this century that means we suddenly have the right to invade the home of wild animals. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy the forest in order to gain the behold benefits like accommodation or feed. There is still having plenty of space for us to exits side by side with animals without attacking them.

I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. The complex web of life provides the natural systems we depend on – giving us essentials like water, clean air, fertile soils, and a stable climate. It gives us food, medicines, and materials, and supports millions of jobs, and inspires people around the world – making our lives richer in all sorts of ways. Wildlife animals are resources and as a result, protect animal help to complete the ecosystem. For example, rainforest produces oxygen, the home of many rare species, absorbs carbon dioxide, and stabilizes the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the consequences outweigh the benefit we see right away. By protecting animal and their habitats we can maintain and balance our life on Earth.

In conclusion, we need to reverse this loss of nature and create a future where wildlife and people thrive again.