Small businesses should avoid recruiting young women who do not have their own families in order to avoid paying for maternity leave later on.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
My answer:
Some people advise that small companies should not hire young, child-free women so as not to pay for their maternity leave in the future. From my point of view, I completely disagree with this statement.
First, hiring young women can be a smart financial strategy for small companies which usually have a limited budget. First, hiring young women can be a smart financial strategy for small companies which usually have a limited budget. They are also less likely to initiate salary negotiations or to overreact when a request for a salary increase is rejected compared to men. On top of that, young women nowadays tend to live alone and focus on their careers. They are ambitious about progressing in their profession, so they work hard and can greatly benefit their companies. Besides, diversity of opinions is important in businesses as it can lead to creativity and innovation, therefore, lacking a unique and different perspective of young women can be a great loss.
Second, young women tend to stay with a company for a long time. They are less likely to switch companies in a short period of time. Furthermore, the cost of living is ever-increasing nowadays, so it is usually necessary for both parents to work in order to support their children. Consequently, young mothers will work hard to avoid getting fired and having to find another job. Moreover, through receiving support during pregnancy and after birth, young mothers are likely to develop gratitude and attachment towards their companies, and therefore become more industrious and diligent with their work. Commercial organizations can obtain loyal employees by hiring young female staff, which is especially important for small businesses as they need to have a stable workforce.
In conclusion, young women can be a cheap, effective workforce who will show their loyalty after receiving maternity subsidies. Thus, small companies should not reject young female candidates because of paid maternity leave and should think of it as an investment in the long run.
phamnuong Small businesses should avoid recruiting young newly-married women who do not have their own families in order to avoid paying for maternity leave later on. To what extent do you agree or disagree? The task was not very well-written.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
phamnuongSmall businesses should avoid recruiting young newly-married womenwho do not have their own familiesin order to avoid paying for maternity leave later on.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The task was not very well-written.
Some people advise that small companies should not hire young, childless child-free women so as not to pay for their maternity leave in the future. From my point of view, ("Disagree" is a point of view. So the phrase is unnecessary and redundant.) I completely disagree with this advice.
Here is another way to write your idea.
Second, women tend to stay with a company longer than their male counterparts. They are less likely to job hop from one company to another for a small increase in salary. Furthermore, even if they do get pregnant and the company pays their maternity leave, it will be of benefit to the company in the long term. The reason for this is higher co