Please help me to correct this, I'm so bad at writing, thank u so much.

People have differing views of whether they should migrate humans to other planets in order to solve the ever-increasing population. In my opinion, both measures have their own perks, but I prefer to have solutions on Earth.

There are various reasons why people want to bring humans to other planets. They may assert that the way of migrating people to another planet can help address the problems of pollution and lack of residential areas for people to live. I believe that this is a possible way to solve the problem, as this will provide people with a new environment so that they might build another Earth on that planet. Moreover, they can utilize modern technology and many policies to apply to the new planet, make it such a better planet and become a new home for humans.

In spite of these arguments, addressing this situation on Earth would be much easier. First, scientists don’t have to find and research if there will be any surviving signal on that planet. They would have to make sure that there is the ability for humans to live, such as oxygen, electricity, nature, and so on. Second, governments can make a policy of having one to two children in each household so as to eliminate the possibility of overpopulation. Since then, parents have had to control their sexual desire to follow the policy. As if all problems are caused by human activities, people should find solutions from the root of the problems.

In summary, although both ways of tackling the situation have merits and demerits, I personally prefer to come up with solutions on Earth.