0
Sabyakgp Posted 19 years ago
Grammar
Please help me in understanding this sentence.
Hello Friends,
I would like to know whether the below sentence is correct or not.
The Pro-Deal argument is that it opens a door for supply of nuclear fuel without India having had to sign the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty.
I think it should be "having to" rather than "having had to". Could you please explain me the reason the writer has used present perfect participle here.
Please help me.
Best Regards,
Sabya
I would like to know whether the below sentence is correct or not.
The Pro-Deal argument is that it opens a door for supply of nuclear fuel without India having had to sign the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty.
I think it should be "having to" rather than "having had to". Could you please explain me the reason the writer has used present perfect participle here.
Please help me.
Best Regards,
Sabya
Top answer
Sabyakgp Hello Friends, I would like to know whether the below sentence is correct or not. The Pro-Deal argument is that it opens a door for supply of nuclear fuel without India having had to sign the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty. I think it should be "having to" rather than "having had to".
- Sabyakgp Hello Friends, I would like to know whether the below sentence is correct or not.
- The Pro-Deal argument is that it opens a door for supply of nuclear fuel without India having had to sign the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty.
- I think it should be "having to" rather than "having had to".
- Could you please explain me the reason the writer has used present perfect participle here.
- Please help me.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
2 Answers
0
SabyakgpHello Friends,
I would like to know whether the below sentence is correct or not.
The Pro-Deal argument is that it opens a door for supply of nuclear fuel without India having had to sign the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty.
I think it should be "having to" rather than "having had to". Could you pleas
00
Thanks Philip,
I think the writer would have that India has to sign the NPT (Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty) and subsequently get access to internation market. But unfortunately, this makes the whole sentence incomprehensible.
I think the writer would have that India has to sign the NPT (Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty) and subsequently get access to internation market. But unfortunately, this makes the whole sentence incomprehensible.
0
Related Questions