Please help me correct this sentence.

I don't think emerging from a frontier sounds good. Maybe something like "...over which I will step..."?

So....This the sentence would be "I have always viewed it as a new frontier over which I will step irrevocably changed and ready to live my life and start my career."?

RmontezI have always viewed it as a new frontier from which I would emerge irrevocably changed and ready to live my life and rstart my career

\

This is not a well formed sentence. What is "it"?

Especially this part "I would emerge irrevocably changed and (non- par

RmontezI knew that when I started to attend college, I wanted more out of it than just academics. I have always viewed it as a new frontier from which I would emerge irrevocably changed and ready to live my life and restart my career.

I knew that when I started to attend college, I wanted more out of it than just academics. I

Goodman: «I would emerge irrevocably changed and (non- paralell with "would") ready to live my life and rstart my career"»

Why are they non-parallel?

I would emerge:
a) irrevocably changed
b) ready to live...

The way I perceived it was "I would emerge irrevocably changed and would be ready to live... "

It appeared to me as a compound sentence because of "and". What you just showed is that you are saying it's ok to express it as

"I would emerge ready to live….and I would emerge irrevocably cha

Goodman: «What you just showed is that you are saying it's ok to express it as

"I would emerge ready to live….and I would emerge irrevocably changed."»

Yes.

«If it true, then I am saying the same thing but I saw the latter part missing “would be”.»

I am sorry, but I didn't understand you. Does it have to have the second "would be"?

«I’ll retract it if i