Please help correct my essay!

Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Opinions are divided as to whether there should be governmental expenditure on the preservation of endangered linguistic items or it would be money-wasting. Personally, I firmly assert that money should be spent on other issues instead of saving scarcely spoken languages as it can help more deprived families worldwide.

On the one hand, proponents of the government spending money conserving endangered languages may believe that this will possibly allow outsiders to support people in these indigenous communities in some aspects. As governments can hire professional translators and crowdsource translation projects to enable speakers of endangered languages to access these facilities and receive adequate health or education services. Gradually, this can help enhance their quality of life significantly. Besides, should governments to boost investment in the preservation of these languages, they can explain many historical records and mysteries that remained unsolved, thereby helping the humanity to gain a deeper insight into these previously unknown cultures.

Nonetheless, opponents of saving languages may argue that this sum of money can be allocated to solving other intractable issues such as abject penury. Undoubtedly, these problems are yet to be solved comprehensively despite the rise of philanthropic work, and yet continue afflicting several families more severely in comparison to the extinction of endangered languages. Indeed, the authorities should actively provide aid to several economically disadvantaged regions which are confronted by prolonged shortages of food and water more urgently to lift them out of extreme poverty. Therefore, the governmental expenditure on these matters are more worthwhile as it can alleviate widespread human suffering, which outweigh the capabilities of the conversation of languages.

In conclusion, though I agree that the conservation of rarely spoken languages can promote mutual understanding for alien cultures yet disadvantaged, thereby supporting their members concerning access to health care and education, I strongly concur that this allocation should be redirected to addressing key issues to maximize its effect.