0
Guest Posted 22 years ago
Grammar

Please help... analysis

I have a question about some sentences: I really hope somebody can help me. Here it goes:
1. The airport will have to do a cost - benefit analysis before building the new runway..... My question is if "before building the new runway" is A/Clause or A/PP?? And in "will have to do" is "to do" included in the VP?
2. "It's been brought to my notice that you have expressed your dislike of a certain member of the company" - is "to my notice" A/PP and the rest of the sentence Sr/clause??
3. "some journalists expect the editors to retain responsibility for work in progress when they leave" - Is editors an IO??

I thank you in advance... Best regards from Denmark
  

Top answer

Some of this analytic terminology changes so often that it's impossible to give a definitive answer without knowing the methodology taken by your textbook - or whatever you're using as your guide. "before building a new runway" sounds like a (subordinate) clause to me! "before (PRO they) build (ing) a new runway" Taking a stab at "have to do", I would say have [ Clause [NP PRO (airport)] [VP to do [NP a cost-benefit analysis]] endClause] No guarantees that this is what you need!

  • Some of this analytic terminology changes so often that it's impossible to give a definitive answer without knowing the methodology taken by your textbook - or whatever you're using as your guide.
  • "before building a new runway" sounds like a (subordinate) clause to me!
  • "before (PRO they) build (ing) a new runway" Taking a stab at "have to do", I would say have [ Clause [NP PRO (airport)] [VP to do [NP a cost-benefit analysis]] endClause] No guarantees that this is what you need!
  • "to my notice" is a PP.
  • The rest of the sentence is a clause, but I don't understand "Sr/clause".
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
Some of this analytic terminology changes so often that it's impossible to give a definitive answer without knowing the methodology taken by your textbook - or whatever you're using as your guide.

"before building a new runway" sounds like a (subordinate) clause to me!
"before (PRO they) build (ing) a new runway"

Taking a stab at "have to do", I would say

have
0
CJ

I guess he meant "Subject-related clause" by the notation of "Sr/clause".

paco
0
Got it! Thanks!

Yes, the clause is the subject, but displaced by the subject place holder "it".

Related Questions