This my last essay for 12th Grade and I really want to make sure it is worthy of a pre-college or even a college level grade, therefore I would like someone to read it and giving any constructive criticism if possible. I would sincerely appreciate it.
It's a compare and contrast essay, thus you can criticism accordingly.
How can to similar men be so different? By contrasting Augustus M. Toplady and Matthew Arnold one can easily see how similar but yet so different men can be. Each prolific writer enjoyed discoursing in similar topics; however, they discussed matters of their time and they greatly varied in upbringing, financial circumstances, writing styles, but more importantly who they relied upon. Augustus Toplady was born in Farnham, Surrey, England in November 1740. He later became a notable Anglican minister and compiled a collection of 418 hymns which included many authors such as Watts, Wesley, other nonconformist writers, and six of his own hymns. His most beloved and famous hymn is “Rock of Ages”, which is still sung in modern-day churches. In his work’s preface, Toplady wisely wrote, “God is the God of Truth, of Holiness, and of Elegance. Whoever therefore has the honor to compose, or to compile, anything that may constitute a part of worship, should keep those particulars constantly in view.” In his last three years of life he spent his remaining time in London, preaching regularly in a French Calvinist chapel. Matthew Arnold was born in Laleham, Middlesex, England in December 1822. Arnold’s life vastly differed from Toplady’s considering that Arnold was an essayists and not a hymn writer like Toplady. However, he unremittingly wrote poetry in the 1850’s and from the 1860’s until his death Arnold focused primarily on literary and social criticism. Later on in his life he was fortunate enough to gain a full-time position of Inspector of Schools; however this meant that he could only work on his writings in the time his job permitted. Nonetheless, he published outstanding works that became incredibly famous such as “Dover Beach (1867) and Thyrsis (1866). Although Arnold expressed his philosophy that the Victorian Age lacked culture and morality, he didn’t acknowledge the need for salvation and instead said morally sound literature could make religion inane when he penned that religion is nothing more than “morality touched with emotion.” Arnold lived entirely in the nineteen century and became an Inspector of Schools, poet, essayist, classical scholar, and an educator, whereas Toplady lived in the eighteen century and became a major in the Royal Marines, and was a hymn writer. Although Arnold may be more versed in literature and scholarly works than Toplady, he did not acknowledge his sinful nature and accepted Jesus Christ as the only way to salvation, in other words he relied upon his intellect rather than God, unlike Toplady, who recognized God in the affairs of man and the need of repentance. Matthew Arnold and Augustus M. Toplady were two very interesting men whom were blessed with the talent for writing which this is clearly seen in their works. Although they took very dissimilar paths in life, they contributed to world and their own community by medium of their writings and occasional discourses. But the unfortunate fact that one of these two influential men held very different views on the crucial topic of self-reliance. Arnold believed that one can achieve inner peace and resolve by finding oneself and this reflected in his work “Self-Dependence”: “O air-born voice! long since, severely clear, A cry like thine in mine own heart I hear: ‘Resolve to be thyself; and know that he, Who finds himself, loses his misery!”, whereas Toplady relied upon Jesus Christ and seeking God’s forgiving arms, we can also see this his work “Rock of Ages”: “While I draw this fleeting breath, When my eyes shall close in death, When I rise to worlds unknown, And behold thee on thy throne, Rock of Ages, cleft for me, Let my hide myself in thee.” This is the only contrast that makes these men so vastly different.
Top answer
Hi; It is obvious that you have worked hard on this paper. It is difficult to compare two writers where one has so much more published material than the other. However, you have made some errors, How can to similar men be so different?
— AlpheccaStars
Hi; It is obvious that you have worked hard on this paper.
It is difficult to compare two writers where one has so much more published material than the other.
However, you have made some errors, How can to similar men be so different?
Arnold was an essayists and not a hymn writer (ps.
) from the 1860’s until his death Arnold focused primarily on literary and social criticism.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
It is obvious that you have worked hard on this paper. It is difficult to compare two writers where one has so much more published material than the other.
However, you have made some errors, How can to similar men be so different? Arnold was an essayists and not a hymn writer
well i think you did pretty good but however it seems that your doing abeka Home School progam and if so then the composition is " Finish planning two page literary essay CONTRASTING arnold and toplady. You put it was a a compare and contrast essay and thats how you wrote your essay. so it needs to just CONTRASTING!