0
Sarah88 Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

Please explain the structure below

They elected him president of the U.S.

They elected him to be presiden of the U.S.

They elected him to be the president of the U.S.

1) Please explain the difference between the first two sentences. Why can it omit "to be"? please explain with some examples.

2) Is the third one right?
  

Top answer

S. The omission of 'the' suggests this is a title. Consequently, I'd capitalize the word ' P resident'.

  • S.
  • The omission of 'the' suggests this is a title.
  • Consequently, I'd capitalize the word ' P resident'.
  • Same comment as above.
  • S.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
Hi,
They elected him president of the U.S. The omission of 'the' suggests this is a title. Consequently, I'd capitalize the word 'President'.

They elected him to be president of the U.S.Same comment as above.

They elected him to be the president of the U.S.

1) Please explain the difference between the first two sentences. The 'to be' suggests that he did no
0
Dear Clive,

Thank you for clarifying the above. You are a good ESL teacher, and I really want to improve my English. Your replies have always helped me a lot. Therefore, I wrote the following, and I think there must be lots of mistakes there. Could you kindly take a look at it and let me know each correction with explanation? then I can carefully study them afterwards. Many thanks.
0
Verbs which take this kind of structure include call, name, baptize, pronounce, appoint, and elect.

The people elected John leader.
The parents named her Sylvia.
Some people call this effect scintillation.

There are three ways that an object complement can be introduced.
1. With no intervening word (as shown above)
2. With as in be
0
Hi,

Thank you for clarifying the above. You are a good ESL teacher, and I really want to improve my English. Your replies have always helped me a lot. Therefore, I wrote the following, and I think there must be lots of mistakes there. Could you kindly take a look at it and let me know each correction with explanation? then I can carefully study them afterwards. Many thanks.
0
Thank you, Clive.

I still have the following questions, could you kindly help me to clarify them?

...going to leave him for another position soon, but never thought he would come (would have come ? ) to me since I have a boss, and I'm doing well with my current job.

on my second thought, The stand
0
Hi,
...going to leave him for another position soon, but never thought he would come (would have come ? ) to me since I have a boss, and I'm doing well with my current job.
'Would' is better. It relates it more to the present time.

on my second thought, The standard phrase is 'On second thoughts' (Why there is no "the" before "second" and it uses "tho

Related Questions