Many people think that the media should show more stories that report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Opinions are divided on whether the media should frequently cover good news or shift their focus on current issues. Personally, I think these two types of news are equally important, and that they should be moderated properly in order to provide the audience with the best experience.

Initially, the benefits of people exposing themselves to positive information are evident. The most commonly cited one is that good news can promote an optimistic living attitude in the public through the life message and encouraging implication that it conveys. For example, articles reporting scientific breakthroughs in multiple fields, such as the success of the covid 19 vaccine research or potential progress in the treatment of cancer, can uplift people to become more hopeful in the future life, when effective cures for such diseases may have been found.

On the other hand, negative information also plays an equally crucial role in news coverage. Admittedly, unmanaged bad news about terrorism or other dreadful crime may cause massive stress and instill fear into people’s minds, possibly leading them to experience trauma. However, in cases of emergencies such as a natural disaster, advance warnings issued to the local residents can prevent imminent danger and reduce the number of casualties. Similarly, those who are informed about a contagious disease will be more alert and concerned about taking appropriate actions to protect themselves from contracting. These examples shed light on why it makes sense not to hide important news about urgent issues.

In conclusion, while it is important that the media provide people with stories reporting positive news, significant bad news should not be overlooked so that the public can be fully informed about the current affairs in an unbiased way.