Please could somebody check the below for me...

I should have made clear that I am referring to two seperate studies, not one study by two people!

Is anybody able to help me here?

Anybody know the answer?

Andyw12345Hi everybody,

I the below use of ' correct?

Whilst Webster and Gronroos’s work...

I assume that "Webster's and Gronroos's work..." would not make sense?

Thanks,

If you're referring to the work o

Thanks, yes I am referring to both, so "Webster's and Gronroos's work..." is correct?

Maybe use "works" instead of "work"? You are referring to two different workS...

Also personally I'd propose this:

"... the works of Webster and Gronoos"
vs. "the works of Webster&Gronoos", which would mean their common works...

Thanks for your help - very useful.

Andyw12345Thanks, yes I am referring to both, so "Webster's and Gronroos's work..." is correct?

"Webster's and Gronroos's work ..." is correct.

Yoong Liat:
«Webster's and Gronroos's work»

Yoong, do you know of an online book which I can consult about the rule(s) governing this use of posessives?

Andyw12345I should have made clear that I am referring to two seperate studies, not one study by two people!

Is anybody able to help me here?

Ant_222Yoong Liat: «Webster's and Gronroos's work» Yoong, do you know of an online book which I can consult about the rule(s) governing this use of posessives?

Google for 'possessives' and you'll have a lot of information on the subject.