Please correct my composition, thanks!

Children who are brought up in families which do not have a great amount of money are better prepared to deal with the problem of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. Do you agree or disagree?

Does family wealth means weather the children solve the trouble in adult life? This question is controversial in all ages, not only for professional but also for public as a whole. In this essay, I will give my opinion about this question.

Some people believe that children from the common family are better prepared to solve the trouble of adult life than others grown in wealthy families. For example, from the time they are litter kids, they help their parents to do housework such as shopping, preparing for dinner. In contrast, there are maids in the rich family so that these children usually do not need to do homework and lack this experience of life. For another instance, teenagers whose families are not rich usually have part-time jobs. They gain the increasingly more work experience, whereas wealthy teenagers enjoy the happy teenage life.

However, there are also many wealthy children combated the adult problem well. It was proven by the fact that there are many American presidents who were brought up by rich families. They gain better nurture from the academic knowledge to communication skills to determination. These training help them to solve a large number of troubles on their success road. Thus, the problem which children will face in the future can be tackled by the rich children.

All in all, educational success of children is not decided by their financial status, yet by the nurture after birth. Both children from the common family and those whose parents have a great amount of money can tackle the troubles in their adult life.