0
Myvi Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Please correct me..

"As was mention earlier Madrid (2003) already derived the formulae for first- to third-order ABC method. Thus the formulae listed above for the corresponding order are in Madrid (2003)."
Are these sentences sounds correct? Thanks a lot.
  

Top answer

Hi "As it (we need a subject here, that's why we need to put "it" although it has no meaning in this case) was mention ed earlier ( perhaps "Ancient Madrid" ) Madrid (2003) already derived the formulae for first- to third-order ABC method. " Are these sentences sounds correct? Thanks a lot.

  • Hi "As it (we need a subject here, that's why we need to put "it" although it has no meaning in this case) was mention ed earlier ( perhaps "Ancient Madrid" ) Madrid (2003) already derived the formulae for first- to third-order ABC method.
  • " Are these sentences sounds correct?
  • Thanks a lot.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
Hi

"As it (we need a subject here, that's why we need to put "it" although it has no meaning in this case) was mentioned earlier (perhaps "Ancient Madrid") Madrid (2003) already derived the formulae for first- to third-order ABC method. Thus the formulae listed above for the corresponding order are (perhaps were created)in Madrid (2003)."
Are these sentenc
0
I have derived the formulae for first- to ninth-order ABC method. However, the formulae for first- to third order ABC method were derived by Madrid (2003). I want to emphasize that the formulae listed above for first- to third order ABC method are in Madrid (2003) and the rest are fresh derive by me. Are the sentences above conveys my intention? Thanks a lot..

Related Questions