The given line graph illustrates the percentage of trained employee in 4 discrepant enterprises throughout the period from 2003 to 2006. It is clear that while C, D were obviously above trend; A moved in the contrast direction, compared to the gradual rise of B over 3 years.
Between 2003 and 2004, the proportion of educated people at company D had a slight decline and get 17% in 2004, contrary to the increase of company B and C. At the same time, this figure of A remained stable, around 27%. In 2005, while the figure of staff provided by other three companies tended to be downwards, this rate at institution D doubled to approximate 33% and then sudden diminish the going up pace. In the last year, this figure at vocational centre C reached the higher peak of 36%, similar to D and B, the average difference being roughly 1%. Company A welcomed a new year 2007 with the proportion fluctuated steadily around 27% for almost 36 months.
The graph shows the percentage of staff trained by four different companies between 2003 and 2006. Your sentence does not have the same meaning as the statement above. The given line graph illustrates the percentage of trained employee in 4 discrepant enterprises throughout the period from 2003 to 2006.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
The graph shows the percentage of staff trained by four different companies between 2003 and 2006.
Your sentence does not have the same meaning as the statement above.
The given line graph illustrates the percentage of trained employee in 4 discrepant enterprises throughout th