Please check my writing

Question

It is true that nowadays, people are taking advantage of plastic in aspects related to food and drink. From my perspective, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages

It is undeniable that plastic products may bring great benefits to producers as well as customers. In terms of producers, business companies may utilize plastic containers which have a reasonable price to lower the cost. This means that these firms can gain more profit by cutting packaging cost . Regarding customers’ benefits, due to the convenience of its lightweight and durability, people may feel more comfortable transporting food products. For example, people are likely to purchase plastic bottles rather than glass ones owing to the bulky package of glass products

On the other hand, the overuse of plastic bags may pose a threat to the environment and living organisms. As plastics are attributed to be non-degradable things, traditional way to dissolve is burning them that generates toxic fumes into the air , thus plastic waste disposal may have a negative impact on the quality of air.As a consequence, when people inhale into body, there is likelihood that they may suffer from respiratory disease. Moreover, those who consume food products, specifically, fishes can be subjected to microplastics because marine creatures may easily accumulate these toxic substances under the water. As a result, there is a growing risk of digestive disorders or even cancer to people.

In conclusion, although the efficient utilization of plastics may offer several benefits to the enterprises in terms of profit and bring convenience to customers, it may negatively affect the environment and be one of the reasons for human health’s deterioration. I think the drawbacks outweigh the benefits in the long term

Teechr · Accepted Answer

Hi,

What is the exact question/prompt for the above essay?

Zany piano 596 · Answer

Over the last few decades, there has been an increase in population density. Consequently, many a person in urban areas resides in modest spaces and without open-air space. I take benefits and drawbacks into account in equal measure and my justifications are as follows.

On the one hand, the avail of this trend is that it is liable to facilitate saving money. It seems to be ascribed

On the one hand, the avail of this trend is that it is liable to facilitate saving money. It seems to be ascribed to the fact that such accommodations probably require less furniture and home maintenance is likely to be inexpensive compared to huge dwellings. In addition, much as house rents and purchases can incur an enormous expense, house prices keep soaring. Hence, it would be a judicious decision to opt for a bijou residence without any outdoor space because it would be not prohibitive. Lightening the financial burden is conducive to fulfilling demands for eating, education, and recreational activities, which can empower citizens to enhance their quality of life.

On the other hand, such houses could exert an adverse influence on city dwellers. They can pose serious health hazards. When it comes to fitness, these urbanites tend to face risks of a sedentary lifestyle in the light of the scarcity of space, namely backyards to do physical activities. They, as a result, are more likely to contract diseases such as obesity and cardiovascular diseases. Besides, that spaces are narrow would restrict the number of family get-togethers, to the detriment of psychological health. No available space do they have to throw exhilarating barbecues or garden parties.

In conclusion, I hold the notion that this tendency in megacities exercises salutary and deleterious effects on life including health and budget.

Zany piano 596 · Answer

Over the last few decades, there has been an increase in population density. Consequently, many a person in urban areas resides in modest spaces and without open-air space. I take benefits and drawbacks into account in equal measure and my justifications are as follows.

On the one hand, the avail of this trend is that it is liable to facilitate saving money. It seems to be ascribed

On the one hand, the avail of this trend is that it is liable to facilitate saving money. It seems to be ascribed to the fact that such accommodations probably require less furniture and home maintenance is likely to be inexpensive compared to huge dwellings. In addition, much as house rents and purchases can incur an enormous expense, house prices keep soaring. Hence, it would be a judicious decision to opt for a bijou residence without any outdoor space because it would be not prohibitive. Lightening the financial burden is conducive to fulfilling demands for eating, education, and recreational activities, which can empower citizens to enhance their quality of life.

On the other hand, such houses could exert an adverse influence on city dwellers. They can pose serious health hazards. When it comes to fitness, these urbanites tend to face risks of a sedentary lifestyle in the light of the scarcity of space, namely backyards to do physical activities. They, as a result, are more likely to contract diseases such as obesity and cardiovascular diseases. Besides, that spaces are narrow would restrict the number of family get-togethers, to the detriment of psychological health. No available space do they have to throw exhilarating barbecues or garden parties.

In conclusion, I hold the notion that this tendency in megacities exercises salutary and deleterious effects on life including health and budget.

Please check my writing

Top answer

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

Related Questions