Topic: Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find out a way to live with it. What extend do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the problem of global warming has been receiving a great deal of media attention over the world. Although co-existing with climate change is not without plausibility, some practical measures should be considered to reduce the effects of natural disasters.
There are several reasons to explain why some people incline the idea of co-existing with global warming. Since it is agreed that natural disasters are inevitable, preventing them will be impossible. For example, Japan annually suffers from earthquakes or some countries in Southeast Asia always face to the annual typhoons. This can be caused by changes in the Earth's topography and geographic structure. Second, technology development has brought some feasible methods to live with climate change. In fact, many machines were invented against searing heat, which helps people overcome the heath threat of excessive heat.
Nevertheless, it is necessary to find out proactive solutions to prevent natural disasters. First, global warming is largely shaped by human activities rather than nature itself. If people are not responsible for what they have done on nature, the result is huge losses. Since climate change is mainly caused by human actions such as carbon emission, deforestation and fossil fuel, leading to greenhouse effects and frequent typhoons. Second, natural disasters, in the long run, will destroy the biodiversity, which can have effects on humans. Therefore it should be prevented by feasible actions, not by co-existing.
In conclusion, the idea of coexistence between climate change and human appears plausible. It is emphasized to find out other practical approaches to combat this problem instead of accepting in the long run.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.