It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is supposed that schoolchildren’s studying about the history of their hometown is more significant than world history. From my point of view, learning about world history shares equal importance as local one.
On the one hand, it is crucial for children attending school to gain knowledge about their national history. First and foremost, having a thorough insight into what happened in the past at one’s locality develops his patriotism. In Vietnam, for example, pupils are taught about how their ancestors content against outside intruders to reclaim sovereignty. As the result, those young children would take pride in their origin and treasure the life they know as it is today. What’s more, through understanding about historical background, schoolgirls and schoolboys will become more aware about future. If they have a good grasp of traditional values and identity which billions of people sacrificed their lives to protect, they will have motivation to continue preserving and developing those cultural characteristics at present and during later periods.
Despite the importance of the domestic history, I would argue that learning about the world one plays similar integral part. Acquiring knowledge about the world’s events in the past equips students with well-rounded perspective of life. Through historical events such as the World War or the establishment process of nations, schoolchildren will enhance their understanding about various aspects of the world. Furthermore, it is meaningful to provide pupils with relevant knowledge of the history of humankind so that they can prepare to live as a global citizen. It helps narrow culture gap among countries. Therefore, youngsters at schools have more opportunities to get access to the world’s cultural knowledge and get ready for the roles they will play as citizens of both their country and the world.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is difficult to compare the importance of local history and world one because they have equal meanings with children.
It is supposed that Is schoolchildren’s studying about the history of their hometown ("hometown" is not about your country, only the city or village where you were born. ") is more significant than studying world history ? ) From my point of view, learning about world history shares equal importance as (missing word) local one .
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
It is supposed that Is schoolchildren’s studying about the history of their hometown ("hometown" is not about your country, only the city or village where you were born. I think the topic is broader than "hometown.") is more significant than studying world history? (Change the topic sentence into a question that you are going to