Are these sentences correct with the given meanings: 1-We need a player to score goals. 2-We need a player for scoring goals. Meaning: We need a player who will/can score goals. We need a goal-scoring player. That would imply that we need a new player. I think "1" could also mean: We need for a player to score goals. In this case, one of the players we already have has to score goals.
3-We need more players to score goals. 4-We need more players for scoring goals. Meaning: We need a greater number of players who can score goals. We need a greater number of goal-scoring players. We need new players and they have to be ones who score goals. It seems to me that "3" also means: We need for more players to score goals. Here, the need is for more of the players we already have to score goals. Gratefully, Navi.
Top answer
Your analyses are correct. However, I don't find 2 or 4 very idiomatic. CJ
— CalifJim
Your analyses are correct.
However, I don't find 2 or 4 very idiomatic.
CJ
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Those sentences are all grammatical, but I think you should be more descriptive. I would avoid (1), (2), and (4) entirely unless the context really demanded it.
(1) We need a player to score goals (2) We need a player for scoring goals (3) We need more players to score goals (4) We need more players for scoring goals