After eating, Leslie took her test. In a video a professor said that the bold sentence is a prepositional phrase, but I think that is a reduced subordinate adverbial clause of time. Am I right? If not, can you explain why?
After can be either a proposition or a subordinator. The professor has analyzed it as a preposition. Your analysis is a more modern grammatical analysis and his is more of a traditional analysis.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
After can be either a proposition or a subordinator.
The professor has analyzed it as a preposition. Your analysis is a more modern grammatical analysis and his is more of a traditional analysis.
After eating, Leslie took her test.
I agree with the professor that "after" is a preposition and hence "after eating" is a PP, not a clause.
Traditional grammar treats "after" as a preposition when it has a noun phrase complement, and a subordinating conjunction when it introduces a clause. But modern grammar simply treats it as a preposition irrespective of w