Daphne Schroder I have no clue what they mean with by that. I'm not surprised. It's contradictory.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Daphne SchroderI have no clue what they meanI'm not surprised. It's contradictory. Take the word "kangaroo".withby that.
Daphne SchroderHello people,currently I am studying pronunciation.The book (English pronunciation for student teachers) writes the following: "A stressed syllable plus any following unstressed syllable is a foot. A word therefore consists of as many feet as there are stressed syllables in it."I have no clue what they mean with that.Could anybody please explain this to me
CalifJimA stressed syllable plus any following unstressed syllable is a foot.Doesn´t the word any in this sentence imply that we´re talking about unstressed syllables that might (but not necessarily) follow? Differently put, doesn't it mean that it's also a foot when not followed by an unstressed syllable? I was just wondering about that.
dokterjokkebrokDoesn´t the word any in this sentence imply that we´re talking about unstressed syllables that might (but not necessarily) follow?Yes. Now that I take a second look, I suppose that is a valid interpretation. I do think, however, that the authors could have expressed it more clearly and saved us the trouble of analyzing their remarks in such l
CalifJimI do think, however, that the authors could have expressed it more clearly and saved us the trouble of analyzing their remarks in such laborious detail!Actually, I've met one of the authors once. I'll make sure to mention it next time I see him.