0
Daphne Schroder Posted 16 years ago
Speech & Pronunciation

Phonological foot

Hello people,

currently I am studying pronunciation.
The book (English pronunciation for student teachers) writes the following: "A stressed syllable plus any following unstressed syllable is a foot. A word therefore consists of as many feet as there are stressed syllables in it."

I have no clue what they mean with that.
Could anybody please explain this to me. As simple as possible.

Sincerely,

Daphne
  

Top answer

Daphne Schroder I have no clue what they mean with by that. I'm not surprised. It's contradictory.

  • Daphne Schroder I have no clue what they mean with by that.
  • I'm not surprised.
  • It's contradictory.
  • Take the word "kangaroo".
  • A stressed syllable plus any following unstressed syllable is a foot.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

14 Answers
0
Daphne SchroderI have no clue what they mean with by that.
I'm not surprised. It's contradictory. Take the word "kangaroo".

A stressed syllable plus any following unstressed syllable is a foot.

KANG a ROO. KANG is stressed and has a following unstressed syllable, namely
0
Daphne SchroderHello people,currently I am studying pronunciation.The book (English pronunciation for student teachers) writes the following: "A stressed syllable plus any following unstressed syllable is a foot. A word therefore consists of as many feet as there are stressed syllables in it."I have no clue what they mean with that.Could anybody please explain this to me
0
Hi Jim,
CalifJimA stressed syllable plus any following unstressed syllable is a foot.
Doesn´t the word any in this sentence imply that we´re talking about unstressed syllables that might (but not necessarily) follow? Differently put, doesn't it mean that it's also a foot when not followed by an unstressed syllable? I was just wondering about that.
0
dokterjokkebrokDoesn´t the word any in this sentence imply that we´re talking about unstressed syllables that might (but not necessarily) follow?
Yes. Now that I take a second look, I suppose that is a valid interpretation. I do think, however, that the authors could have expressed it more clearly and saved us the trouble of analyzing their remarks in such l
0
CalifJimI do think, however, that the authors could have expressed it more clearly and saved us the trouble of analyzing their remarks in such laborious detail!
Actually, I've met one of the authors once. I'll make sure to mention it next time I see him.
0
Hello People,

thank you for explaining it. My problem is solved.

And to DJB, please mention it to one of the writers. My whole class had problems with this chapter. And the exam went terribly wrong, my class contains 25 students. 1 passed the test.

Cheers!
0
Dear Daphne,

I'm glad to hear you got a pass. I will tell Mr. Gussenhoven. Emotion: smile

- DJB -
0
Oops. sorry Daphne. I misread and thought you had passed the test, but now I see you wrote '1' and not 'I'. My bad.

So were you the one student who passed it?

- DJB -
0
No, sadly not.
I have my resit in August and I'm studying really hard for it right now.
That is why I posted the question. I want to be prepared for every aspect of the exam.

Cheers
0
Hi,

I'm sorry to hear that. That's too bad. Hopefully your resit will give you better results.

Good luck! Emotion: smile

Related Questions