0
Usenet Posted 23 years ago
Usage
Personnel / Personal
I thought the distinction between Personnel and Personal was as clear left-pondinentally as right. But I was watching an episode of 'Will and Grace' (so sue me - I like Jack and I love Karen) and there was a scene set in a public swimming baths with a prominent notice on the wall referring to 'Security of Personnel belongings'. Was this a massive blooper, an in-joke, or is there such a usage in US? -- John Dean Oxford De-frag to reply
Top answer
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:45 +0100, "John Dean" (Email Removed) said: 1 2 3 4 5 6 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890 [nq:1]I thought the distinction between Personnel and Personal was as clear left-pondinentally as right. But I was watching an episode ... to 'Security of Personnel belongings'.
- On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:45 +0100, "John Dean" (Email Removed) said: 1 2 3 4 5 6 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890 [nq:1]I thought the distinction between Personnel and Personal was as clear left-pondinentally as right.
- But I was watching an episode ...
- to 'Security of Personnel belongings'.
- [/nq] Are you sure it's impossible in the UK?
- It seems to me "personnel belongings" can be construed to refer to property belonging to personnel, as opposed to property belonging to the public.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
16 Answers
0
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:45 +0100, "John Dean" (Email Removed) said: 1 2 3 4 5 6 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
[nq:1]I thought the distinction between Personnel and Personal was as clear left-pondinentally as right. But I was watching an episode ... to 'Security of Personnel belongings'. Was this a massive blooper, an in-joke, or is there such a usage in US?[/n
[nq:1]I thought the distinction between Personnel and Personal was as clear left-pondinentally as right. But I was watching an episode ... to 'Security of Personnel belongings'. Was this a massive blooper, an in-joke, or is there such a usage in US?[/n
00
(Email Removed) spake thus:
[nq:1]On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:45 +0100, "John Dean" (Email Removed) said: 1 2 3 4 5 6 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890[/nq]
Are you laying out a line-printer report?
[nq:2]I thought the distinction between Personnel and Personal was as ... an in-joke, or is there such a usage in US?[/nq]
[nq:1]Are you sure it's impossible i
[nq:1]On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:45 +0100, "John Dean" (Email Removed) said: 1 2 3 4 5 6 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890[/nq]
Are you laying out a line-printer report?
[nq:2]I thought the distinction between Personnel and Personal was as ... an in-joke, or is there such a usage in US?[/nq]
[nq:1]Are you sure it's impossible i
00
[nq:1](Email Removed) spake thus:[/nq]
[nq:2]On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:45 +0100, "John Dean" (Email Removed) said: 1 2 3 4 5 6 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890[/nq]
[nq:1]Are you laying out a line-printer report? (...)[/nq]
I believe Bob just let it slip that he does the same thing I do when re-wrapping quoted text. Unfortunately, my newsreader doesn't take
[nq:2]On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:45 +0100, "John Dean" (Email Removed) said: 1 2 3 4 5 6 123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890[/nq]
[nq:1]Are you laying out a line-printer report? (...)[/nq]
I believe Bob just let it slip that he does the same thing I do when re-wrapping quoted text. Unfortunately, my newsreader doesn't take
00
[nq:1]'Security of Personnel belongings'.[/nq]
It could have referred to the belongings of the personnel. Or, more likely, those responsible don't know their grammar. -- Marc, No comment
It could have referred to the belongings of the personnel. Or, more likely, those responsible don't know their grammar. -- Marc, No comment
00
[nq:1]On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:45 +0100, "John Dean" (Email Removed) said:[/nq]
[nq:2]I thought the distinction between Personnel and Personal was as ... an in-joke, or is there such a usage in US?[/nq]
[nq:1]Are you sure it's impossible in the UK?[/nq]
Yes.
Adrian
[nq:2]I thought the distinction between Personnel and Personal was as ... an in-joke, or is there such a usage in US?[/nq]
[nq:1]Are you sure it's impossible in the UK?[/nq]
Yes.
Adrian
00
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 02:11:17 +0100, "Adrian Bailey" (Email Removed) said:
[nq:2]On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:45 +0100, "John Dean" (Email Removed) said: Are you sure it's impossible in the UK?[/nq]
[nq:1]Yes.[/nq]
I wonder how effectivelly you can defend that answer.
Why can't personnel belongings refer to stuff that belongs to personnel, as opposed to public belongings or custo
[nq:2]On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:45 +0100, "John Dean" (Email Removed) said: Are you sure it's impossible in the UK?[/nq]
[nq:1]Yes.[/nq]
I wonder how effectivelly you can defend that answer.
Why can't personnel belongings refer to stuff that belongs to personnel, as opposed to public belongings or custo
00
[nq:1]I thought the distinction between Personnel and Personal was as clear left-pondinentally as right. But I was watching an episode ... to 'Security of Personnel belongings'. Was this a massive blooper, an in-joke, or is there such a usage in US?[/nq]
I've never seen "Will and grace", but could it not have been referring to things that belonged to the staff?
-- Steve Hayes from Ts
I've never seen "Will and grace", but could it not have been referring to things that belonged to the staff?
-- Steve Hayes from Ts
00
[nq:1]On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:45 +0100, "John Dean"[/nq]
[nq:2]... a prominent notice on the wall referring to 'Security ... an in-joke, or is there such a usage in US?[/nq]
[nq:1]Are you sure it's impossible in the UK? It seems to me "personnel belongings" can be construed to refer to property belonging to personnel, as opposed to property belonging to the public.[/nq]
It coul
[nq:2]... a prominent notice on the wall referring to 'Security ... an in-joke, or is there such a usage in US?[/nq]
[nq:1]Are you sure it's impossible in the UK? It seems to me "personnel belongings" can be construed to refer to property belonging to personnel, as opposed to property belonging to the public.[/nq]
It coul
00
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 03:34:45 -0500, Santiago Zawojski (Email Removed) said:
[nq:2]On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:45 +0100, "John Dean"[/nq]
[nq:1][/nq]
[nq:2]Are you sure it's impossible in the UK? It seems ... to personnel, as opposed to property belonging to the public.[/nq]
[nq:1]It could, but people would avoid writing that to avoid looking like they had made a mistake. That's true
[nq:2]On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 16:47:45 +0100, "John Dean"[/nq]
[nq:1][/nq]
[nq:2]Are you sure it's impossible in the UK? It seems ... to personnel, as opposed to property belonging to the public.[/nq]
[nq:1]It could, but people would avoid writing that to avoid looking like they had made a mistake. That's true
00
[nq:1]Why can't personnel belongings refer to stuff that belongs to personnel, as opposed to public belongings or customer belongings?[/nq]
Because in BrE we don't use "personnel" in that way.
[nq:1]Do you think "employee belongings" is also impossible?[/nq]
That's perfectly acceptable. As is "staff belongings". But it isn't usual, in BrE, to refer to staff in general as personnel (ex
Because in BrE we don't use "personnel" in that way.
[nq:1]Do you think "employee belongings" is also impossible?[/nq]
That's perfectly acceptable. As is "staff belongings". But it isn't usual, in BrE, to refer to staff in general as personnel (ex
0
Related Questions