deepcosmos I think "for six weeks' and 'during' mean continuity and 'during' equalsto 'throughout an event'. Thus, 'had been' will be suitable in this context. No, that is irrelevant to past perfect.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
deepcosmosI think "for six weeks' and 'during' mean continuity and 'during' equalsto 'throughout an event'. Thus, 'had been' will be suitable in this context.No, that is irrelevant to past perfect. Your understanding of that verb form is incorrect. Past perfect requires another past but more recent action.
deepcosmosAnd then, can the expression - "during" and "for 6 weeks" - satisfythe condition of past perpfect, which means an action that lasted from a previous past to a recent past ?No, that is not what past perfect means. I repeat: it means an action which occurred before another past action (in cases where the order of the two events is otherwise unclear o
deepcosmosI think "for six weeks' and 'during' mean continuity and 'during' equals to 'throughout an event'.There's something wrong with your reasoning here. Continuity, 'during', and 'throughout' do not indicate that the past perfect is necessary. Maybe you're thinking of something you read regarding
Thus, 'had been' will be suitable in this context.