Ant_222 Shouldn't it be "must have been"? I think so, yes, at least in today's English. Personally, I don't usually spend a lot of time trying to psychoanalyze why authors nearly 100 years ago chose this or that tense!
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Ant_222Shouldn't it be "must have been"?I think so, yes, at least in today's English. Personally, I don't usually spend a lot of time trying to psychoanalyze why authors nearly 100 years ago chose this or that tense!
CalifJim Personally, I don't usually spend a lot of time trying to psychoanalyze why authors nearly 100 years ago chose this or that tense!Hello, CJ, and thanks for the feedback. I bet you don't stumble over such things either. You are a native and most of the things that even experienced non-natives can't digest, you find natural.
CalifJimThat reminds me. Have you ever read a translation of Eugene Onegin (in English) that you found satisfactory?No, and I haven't read any translations of it. I mean prose, not poetry.