Ali: I had had my lunch then washed my hands in the canteen this morning. Ali:I had my lunch then washed my hands in the canteen this morning. I think the first one is just the right one. Because I used past perfect for the action that happened before a past tense action. This is a rule we have learnt. Action happened before an action which is past tense we should use past perfect tense. But I think the second one sounds more natural. Many Thanks in Advance. Victory Ong
Top answer
Please!
— Lucus Ong
Please!
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
I had had my lunch then washed my hands in the canteen this morning.
Because I used past perfect for the action that happened before a past tense action
I see no need to use past perfect in the context posted. To me the 2 actions (had lunch and washed your hand) all happened in the morning. A simple past tense is adeq
Please allow me to confirm my understanding to your words/
She baked the cake after she had read the recipe. it's right to use both past tense or past perfect tense in this sentence However, past perfect can emphase the sequence. Am I right? Many Thanks in Advance
Adding to Clive's comments, here is how I would approach past perfect. Natural English should not be bound by the confines of the grammar rules.
By that, I mean if we can communicate an idea in an uncomplicated manner without involing a complex tense and structure, by all means use it. Past perfect is like a power tool, it can help us to describe past events more a