I guess they are all wrong in the first place. "when" should be "after".
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
tarirotariHi, 1. When Martin had repaired the car, he took it out for a drive.2. When Martin repaired the car, he took it out for a drive.Is sentence 2 possible?How is the meaning different from sentence 1?ThanksWhen as an introduction to a dependent clause generally has a meaning of "at the same time as the main clause."
AlpheccaStarsThe 2 sentences in your question are not natural to me. I would use "after," not "when." It can be used with either the past or past perfect.Another two cents.
After Martin (had) repaired the car, he took it out for a drive.
tarirotari1. When Martin had repaired the car, he took it out for a drive.Sentence 2 is possible and understandable, but it's not, in my opinion, the best way of expressing the thought. I have a definite preference for sentence 1.
2. When Martin repaired the car, he took it out for a drive.
Is sentence 2 possible?
CalifJimAStars: Do you have any strong feelings about the use of "once" or "as soon as" in these patterns? That is, are they equally good as "after"? Or as bad as "when"?Once / (as soon as) he had repaired the car, he took it for a drive.
AlpheccaStarsOnce / (as soon as) he had repaired the car, he took it for a drive.Thanks for the input on that. I had to think about it for a while, but I finally decided the same as you did.