What do you think? and why? We don't want to just give you the answer not knowing if you understand the reason.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
beta_teacherPast progressive or Past Perfect ProgressiveOf the two, past progressive is the only one that seems idiomatic to my ear, but present is fine as well. In fact, present tense was the first that came to mind for me, i.e., he's a 'fast walker'. And the simple past is also fine.
AnonymousI think a good tense option after a past tense to denote an action that happened before that up to that the time shown in the sentence is a past perfect tense,There's nothing wrong with this reasoning, but the time of having trouble must have been the very same time as the walking too fast. If the fast walking had taken place before the walking ses
CliveHi,
Bob and I went for a walk. I had trouble keeping up with him because he had been walking so fast.
This sounds like the action of walking fast occurred before I had trouble keeping up with him, whereas it needs to have been at the same time in order to make sense. That's why it sounds odd.
Here is an example where the sequence of events