PreciousJones Why is it the had arrived and not just arrived? It's a stylistic device to show the reader that the toast had always been assumed to be something that would eventually happen during this reunion scene. The toast was something that the participants in the story were (more or less unconsciously) expecting (or "waiting for") in the natural course of events.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
PreciousJonesWhy is it the had arrived and not just arrived?It's a stylistic device to show the reader that the toast had always been assumed to be something that would eventually happen during this reunion scene. The toast was something that the participants in the story were (more or less unconsciously) expecting (or "waiting for") in the natural course of
CalifJim PreciousJonesWhy is it the had arrived and not just arrived?It's a stylistic device to show the reader that the toast had always been assumed to be something that would eventually happen during this reunion scene. The toast was something that the participants in the story were (more or less unconsciously) expecting (or "waiting for") in the natural course of even
PreciousJonesIf they were expectingWe could debate the psychology of this for weeks, and it's not important for understanding the grammar anyway!forthe toast to happen, wouldn't they be conscious of it?