Hi. Please tell me why it would be correct (if it is indeed correct) to have a past perfect tense in the second (latter) clause in this compound sentence when the second (latter) clause has a date/an year that is later than the first (former/precious) clause. Let us assume the letters XXX's represent three digits of some arbitrary years - starting from the first digits.
They had 20 people in the group in the year XXX7, and this number had risen to 28 by XXX9.
Top answer
I see no reason for the past perfect there unless it relates directly to a later past date in further context.
— Mister Micawber
I see no reason for the past perfect there unless it relates directly to a later past date in further context.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.