Hi everyone,
I understand that this usage is common:
If I had seen you, I would have waved and said "hello". I believe that this is termed the past conditional.
My question: is it all right to change
had seen to
saw?
If I saw you, I would have waved and said "hello". The reason I ask this is because I have read that where the
if clause is not presupposed to be false, the indicative should be used. To quote the Free Dictionary website:
"When the situation described by the
if clause is not presupposed to be false, however, that clause must contain an indicative verb, and the choice of verb in the main clause will depend on the intended meaning:
If Hamlet
was really written by Marlowe, as many have argued, then we have underestimated Marlowe's genius. If Kevin was out all day, then it makes sense that he couldn't answer the phone."(http://www.thefreedictionary.com/IF)I am a bit confused here, and would be grateful for some help. All along, I have been taught to always (more or less) use the past participle in the above examples (i.e.,
If Hamlet
had been written..., If Kevin had been out all day...). Is this a matter of British/American English differences?
Thank you.