Hi everyone,
I have some questions about participial phrases and their functions.
Please take a look at an incorrect sentence below.
Sentence 1 : This building has 100 fully furnished offices, each has its own private meeting rooms.
I understand that Sentence 1 is incorrect and that a number of amendments can be done to make it grammatically correct. One way is to simply add a conjunction "and" to the sentence (See Sentence 2).
Sentence 2 : This building has 100 fully furnished offices, and each has its own private meeting rooms.
However, Sentence 3 seems to work just fine, too.
Sentence 3 : This building has 100 fully furnished offices, each having its own private meeting rooms.
Sentence 3 is written using a participial phrase "each having its own private meeting rooms."
My question is
1) Do sentence 3 and sentence 2 have the same meaning? Can we simply convert sentences with ", and" into sentences containing a participial phrase?
2) What is the function of the phrase "each having its own private meeting rooms" in Sentence 3?
Thank you very much for your help
Kenny
KennyLu 1) Do sentence 3 and sentence 2 have the same meaning? Yes. KennyLu Can we simply convert sentences with ", and" into sentences containing a participial phrase?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
KennyLu1) Do sentence 3 and sentence 2 have the same meaning?
Yes.
KennyLu Can we simply convert sentences with ", and" into sentences containing a participial phrase?
Obviously the overall structure of the original sentence has to be sui
KennyLu1) Do sentence 3 and sentence 2 have the same meaning?
They have the same meaning but a different style.
KennyLuCan we simply convert sentences with ", and" into sentences containing a participial phrase?
Not as a general rule. For example, the following transformation does not work well stylistically.