0
Gori Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

Participial Construction (#3)

Dear teachers,

I believe that the following sentence is what is called a "hanging participle" or a "dangling participle," where the subject in the main clause and the subject in the adverb clause are not the same (one subject is "this power" but the other is not).

Example A)
"When gathering speed, this power along with power from a diesel engine is used to operate the motors. "

Now my question is this: Is the following sentence also a hanging participle (or a dangling participle) because the subjects are not the same between "the size was measured" and "using the ABC method"?

Example B)
"The size was measured using the ABC method.”

Here, just like the example A, the passive tense ("was measured") is used. If this is the participal construction, what is the common subject? Is this really of particpial construction and thus is grammatically correct? Or are the subjects not the same in the example B as well?
  

Top answer

Example A is indeed generally considered incorrect, but despite your comments, A and B are not grammatically identical. Sentence A is an attempt to use what in Europe is usually called a temporal clause equivalent. In such cases, the temporal clause is reduced by omitting the subject and using a participle of the verb.

  • Example A is indeed generally considered incorrect, but despite your comments, A and B are not grammatically identical.
  • Sentence A is an attempt to use what in Europe is usually called a temporal clause equivalent.
  • In such cases, the temporal clause is reduced by omitting the subject and using a participle of the verb.
  • The subject appears in the main clause: When leaving the room, John bumped into an old friend.
  • = When John left the room, he bumped into an old friend.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
Example A is indeed generally considered incorrect, but despite your comments, A and B are not grammatically identical. Sentence A is an attempt to use what in Europe is usually called a temporal clause equivalent. In such cases, the temporal clause is reduced by omitting the subject and using a participle of the verb. The subject appears
0
Thank you for your comment.

Hmmm, although I do understand what you say, I still have a doubt that this is a participal construction with a hanging participle (=means the subjects are different between "the size was measured" and "using the ABC method"). I do understand that this example B ("The size was measured using the ABC method.") can be replaced to the active voice as "We measured
0
The size was measured using the ABC method.”
The phrase "using the ABC method" is an adverb phrase. It modifies the verb "measure". The phrase grammatically has the same function as "carefully" as in:

The size was measured carefully.
It answers the question "how?"
0
Hmmm, I see. So, do you mean that this example B is not a participal construction but simply the sentence including an adverb phrase?

What about in the active voice--"We measured the size, using the ABC method."--though? Is it wrong if I consider it as a participal construction? Is it wrong if I put a comma before "using" in this case? (I put a comma because "using" does not modify
0
Yes it is a participial phrase, since it begins with the present participle. These phrases can function as adjectives or adverbs. If it functions as a noun, the phrase is called a gerund phrase.

It is easier to write a sentence with a dangling participial phrase if the phrase functions as an adjective. It is much more difficult (maybe impossible) to go wrong with an adverb phrase.The voic
0
Sincere thanks to Gori for bringing up the term "dangling participal" and Star for giving a great explanation, I'm learning a lot.

I finished learning grammar (whatever grammar rules were presented in the book I was asked to study) a little while ago, so most of the rules are still fresh. And one of the rules that's, in my impression, no-fooling-around and you have to stick by is that
0
I appreciate all the people who contributed to my thread. Once again, thank you very muchEmotion: smile

Related Questions