0
Gori Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

Participial Construction? (#2)

0Dear professional teachers and native speakers, 02br
02br
00One of the references I encountered says a sentence like the following is a participial construction whose subject is the same between the main clause and the (original) adverb clause. Is it really true? In other words, is the subject in the modifying phrase ("allowing companies to start up such businesses") "Archive services that copy and store information on websites"?? 02br
02br
00(Example) "Archive services that copy and store information on websites could also become legal under the revised law, 01u00allowing 02u00companies to start up such businesses." 02br
02br
00To me, the phrase "allowing companies to start up such businesses" seems to be modifying the whole main clause ("Archive services...under the revised law") though... Therefore, in my understanding, the sentence can be re-written like this: "Archive services that copy and store information on websites could also become legal under the revised law, which allows companies to start up such businesses." Is my understanding wrong? Someone, please, please help me.0-
  

Top answer

12blockquote 10 I would say02br 00... 02br 00I agree that the 01i 00allowing02i 00 clause does not modify 01i 00archive services02i 00. 02br 00CJ 0-

  • 12blockquote 10 I would say02br 00...
  • 02br 00I agree that the 01i 00allowing02i 00 clause does not modify 01i 00archive services02i 00.
  • 02br 00CJ 0-
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
0 01blockquote
01cite10Gori12cite10Therefore, in my understanding, the sentence can be re-written like this: "Archive services that copy and store information on websites could also become legal under the revised law, which allows companies to start up such businesses." Is my understanding wrong?12blockquote
10 I would say02br
0
0To me, in the original "allowing companies to start up such businesses" is logically related to "(become) legal" and the sentence seems fine 0-
0
0Hmm, so, is it wrong if I think that the phrase "allowing companies to start up such businesses" modifies the whole main clause? Do you have a different opinion from Califjim? 02br
02br
00Also, I have heard a different opinion from another person who says the phrase "allowing companies to start up such businesses" modifies "the revised law".02br
02br
00
0
0Let's not get obsessed with the word "modify"! 05002br
00Suppose, for example, that we have these sentences.02br
01i00I accidentally dropped a plate on the floor.02i02br
01i00This caused the plate to break.02i02br
00In what sense does the second sentence 01b00modify02b00 the first? In my op
0
0Thank you for your advice and commnets. They are very informative.05002br
02br
00I appreciate your great help on this matter.010id1
0
Hi, Im Mherapril. I am a Filipina English teacher of grammar and conversation here in South Korea. You may not believe me if I say that 2 subjects existing in the subordinate clause and main clause of a sentence respectively can be possible. That is in the presence of participial construction. Try to look at these examples:

1. There being a huge rock, the explorers couldn't enter the cav

Related Questions