0
Jooney Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

Participial clause

Hi,

"being" in participial clauses can denote one of the following things:

1. linking verb "be"

ex) Being disgusted his betrayal, she went back to Paris.

2. passive "be"

ex) The house is invisible from the road, being surrounded by trees.

3. progressive "be"(?)

ex) Being* helped, ~ (Because I am being helped,~)

* I'm a little confused here. Since "being being helped" is not allowed, only one of the "being" should be used, but the question is which "being" is it? Passive "be" or progressive "be"?

Is it okay to drop "being" in either of the above examples?

What are the conditions for the omission of "being" in participial constructions?

I'd appreciate your help.
  

Top answer

1. " is ungrammatical. " Thus 1.

  • 1.
  • " is ungrammatical.
  • " Thus 1.
  • has the same structure as 2.
  • " 2.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

14 Answers
0
1. "Being disgusted his betrayal, she went back to Paris." is ungrammatical. It should be "Being disgusted by his betrayal..." Thus 1. has the same structure as 2. The "being" can be dropped in this sentence: "Disgusted by his betrayal, she..."

2. "Being" can be dropped here, provided you rearrange the sentence: "Surrounded by trees, the house is invisible from the road."

0
jooney1. linking verb "be"ex) Being disgusted [ by] his betrayal, she went back to Paris.
Correct as revised. As mentioned before, "present participle phrase is non-finite, So I can also say "being disgusted by his betrayal, she has decided to call off the wedding."
jooney The house is invisible from
0
Thank you guys for answering my questions. I'd like to say a few things.

1. The first example should have been written as follows:

Being disgusted at his betrayal, she went back to Paris.

Sorry, I omitted "at" by mistake. Here, the word "disgusted" is an adjective.

2. As for example 2, if you don't arrange the sentence
0
2. In the original sentence, "The house is invisible from the road, being surrounded by trees.", it is clear that "being surrounded by trees" modifies "house." If you omit "being" without rearranging the sentence, "The house is invisible from the road, surrounded by trees.", it is no longer clear what "surrounded by trees" modifies - it could be the house or the road.

3. In English, t
0
Thank you for your answers, Anonymous. I have some questions about your answers.

2. If you omit "being" without rearranging the sentence, "The house is invisible from the road, surrounded by trees.", it is no longer clear what "surrounded by trees" modifies - it could be the house or the road.

Q1) So is it safe to say that "being" cannot be
0
jooney2. If you omit "being" without rearranging the sentence, "The house is invisible from the road, surrounded by trees.", it is no longer clear what "surrounded by trees" modifies - it could be the house or the road.
That's why I moved the adverbial to the front of the sentence. It sounded really strange as you had it.
jooney3. Let m
0
Disgusted "at" is wrong and unidiomatic. "By" is correct.

It was taken directly from a grammar book written by a native speaker. Well, actually, the example in my grammar book does not have "being" in front of the sentence. Nonetheless, that is irrelevant as to whether "at" is the right preposition or not.
0
jooney So you don't think there is no participial counterpart for "I'm being helped"?
I would like to see anyone taking a crack at it. That said, we can't just talk about a participle phrase without a semantic reference.
0
There are situations where an -ing form at the end of a sentence can be omitted:

The house is invisible from the road, being a small house built in a hollow.

The house is invisible from the road, a small house built in a hollow. This is okay.

There are situations where an -ing form at the beginning of a sentence can't be omitted:

Being in a hollow, the house is
0
Thank you very much for your answers, Anonymous.

I have one final question.

"Being helped by my neighbor enabled me to avoid having to here someone."

Isn't it true that the underlined can mean either "I was being helped" or "I was helped"? The distinction is lost when it's converted into an -ing form. Right? Then, how do you know which meaning it

Related Questions