0
Jooney Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

Participial clause

Hi,

ex1) We did our best, accomplishing nothing.

A: Even though we did our best, we accomplished nothing.
B: We did our best even though we accomplished nothing.

ex2) He was reading a newspaper, sipping a cup of coffee.

A: While he was reading a newspaper, he was sipping a cup of coffee.
B: He was reading a newspaper, while he was sipping a cup of coffee.

ex3) He drives his car, wearing sunglasses.

A: When he drives his car, he wears sunglasses.
B: He drives his car, when he wears sunglasses.

Can A's and B's be used interchangeably as a counterpart for the participial construction?

I'd appreciate your help.
  

Top answer

ex1) We did our best, accomplishing nothing. A: Even though we did our best, we accomplished nothing. B: We did our best even though we accomplished nothing.

  • ex1) We did our best, accomplishing nothing.
  • A: Even though we did our best, we accomplished nothing.
  • B: We did our best even though we accomplished nothing.
  • I'm inclined to see A as the meaning, but B may be possible.
  • Context would be needed to disambiguate.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
ex1) We did our best, accomplishing nothing.

A: Even though we did our best, we accomplished nothing.
B: We did our best even though we accomplished nothing.

I'm inclined to see A as the meaning, but B may be possible.
Context would be needed to disambiguate.


ex2) He was reading a newspa
0
jooneyWe did our best, accomplishing nothing.
It doesn't sound right to me. If the literal meaning was: Even though we did our best, we accomplished nothing. the better version is "Having tried /done our best, we still couldn't accomplished anything.."
0
Thank you for your answers, CJ.

What I'm trying to do is to see whether a participial clause is always a reduced form of a subordinate conjunction clause. Almost every English grammar book written by a Korean author suggests that is the crux of the conversion rule. So as for example 1, the rule says "Even though we did our best, we accomplished nothing" becomes:

Even though
0
jooneyWhat I'm trying to do is to see whether a participial clause is always a reduced form of a subordinate conjunction clause.
It's the theoretical construct 'reduced form' here that bothers me. I'm not sure that participial clauses are truly reduced forms of anything. They are separate constructions of their own.

In any case, even if we accept th
0
Thank you very much for your help, CJ.

There is just one thing that I need your clarification on.

Even though we did our best, we accomplished nothing.

Possible paraphrases are as follows:

A: Even though doing our best, we accomplished nothing.
B: Doing our best, we accomplished nothing.
C: We accomplished nothing, doing our best.

0
jooneyEven though we did our best, we accomplished nothing.

Possible paraphrases are as follows:

A: Even though doing our best, we accomplished nothing.
B: Doing our best, we accomplished nothing.
C: We accomplished nothing, doing our best.

Which of the above choices would be considered appropriate as a paraphrase for "Even
0
Thank you very much for your help, CJ. I appreciate it.Emotion: smile

Related Questions