0
Taka Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

parenthesis

0 01i00Ken is innocent.02br
02br
02i
00If '01font00having an alibi02font00' is to be used as a parenthesis, is it:02br
02br
01i00(1) Ken, 01font00having an alibi02font00, is innocent.02br
02br
02i
00or02br
02br
01i00(2) Ken is, 01font00having an alibi02font00, innocent.02br
02br
02i
00or both (1) and (2) are acceptable?0-
  

Top answer

12br 12blockquote 10#1 is correct. 0-

  • 12br 12blockquote 10#1 is correct.
  • 0-
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
0 01blockquote
01cite10Taka12cite11i10Ken is innocent.12br
12br
12i
10If '11font10having an alibi12font10' is to be used as a parenthesis, is it:12br
12br
11i10(1) Ken, 11font10having an alibi12font10, i
0
0I think #1 would be much more usual; #2 has the air of a qualifying afterthought during conversation, e.g.02br
02br
001. Ken is – having an alibi – innocent.02br
02br
00MrP0-
0
0 01blockquote
01cite10MrPedantic12cite10I think #1 would be much more usual; #2 has the air of a qualifying afterthought during conversation, e.g.12br
12br
101. Ken is – having an alibi – innocent.12br
12br
10MrP12br
12blockquote
10So, do you think it's possible to generalize it as fo
0
0I wouldn't like to generalize; I think much might depend on the content. But of these:02br
02br
001. Ken, having no siblings, is an only child.02br
02br
002. Ken is – having no siblings – an only child.02br
02br
003. Ken is an only child, having no siblings.02br
02br
00#1 seems the "normal" structure; while #2 and #
0
0 OK.02br
02br
00Finally, let me make sure one thing, from a structual point of view.02br
02br
01i00(1)S auxil.verb/be, 01font00x00 ,00 02font00 V 02br
00(2)S, 01font00x02font00 , auxil.verb/beV02br
02br
02i
00Alth
0
0 Not incorrect, but not usual. Your understanding is correct. 0-
0
0 Thank you.02br
02br
00The last ones are wrongly numbered, but I think you noticed it.0-

Related Questions