I wrote an essay about people's health in the future. My argument was because of environmental pollution, excessive usage of antibiotics and genetically modified food, people's health might decline in the imminent future. Due to the fact that I've already used "environmental pollution" in the above of my essay, I decided to use "the carbon footprint of the world" instead of. I would be really grateful if someone could let me know whether my approach is acceptable or not. I mean, increasing air and water pollution could lead to an increase in the carbon footprint of the world. That's why I used this phrase, though I'm not precisely sure about it.
The predominant reason for this is increasing the carbon footprint of the world and too much reliance of antibiotics and genetically modified food.
dileepa the carbon footprint of the world That makes no sense, sorry. "Carbon footprint" refers to the average amount of CO 2 per year that an individual citizen of a country produces. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant like nitrogen or sulfur oxides.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
dileepathe carbon footprint of the world
That makes no sense, sorry. "Carbon footprint" refers to the average amount of CO2 per year that an individual citizen of a country produces. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant like nitrogen or sulfur oxides.
What kind of pollution do you mean?