1i00I am in Calcutta, India, the city I grew up in and still call home. It was supposed to have been a busy day for me. I had meetings set up, errands to run, host a play date for my son, have lunch with friends. Instead, I’ll be at home all day. Today - and tomorrow.02i02br 02br 00Applying the parallelism rule, below is my interpretation02br 02br 00 I had meetings set up,(I had) errands to run,(I had) host a play date for my son,(I had) have lunch with friends. Instead, I’ll be at home all day. Today - and tomorrow02br 02br 00Is my application of the rule incorrect because "I had host and I had have lunch" don't sound right to me?02br 02br 00Thanks.0-
Top answer
0The are not parallel: meetings set up, errands to run, a play date to host, and a lunch planned with friends0-
— BarbaraPA
0The are not parallel: meetings set up, errands to run, a play date to host, and a lunch planned with friends0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0Thanks, GG. Your version is correct to me. I can't accept the original version because it doesn't follow the rule and therefore, the last two items are incomplete, IMO. Is it common and how acceptable is it?0-
0Grammatically it doesn't work at all - those second two phrases cannot follow "I had."02br 02br 00However, when we speak, we don't always remember how we started the sentence or we change the flow of our thoughs. You certainly wouldn't have any trouble understanding what the person was trying to say.0-