overtime

0 Hi n2g, what do you want us to do? 0-

0 Sorry. I left out my question. Are there any mistakes, as usual? 0-

0Some employees in the US are filing a lawsuit against their employers for sending them emails on their blackberries after work. According to them, they felt obligated to reply and they were dissatisfied for not getting paid for overtime. 02br
00I would use obliged instead of obligated - but it may be a Br E thing.02br
02br
00...................and they were un

0 I think that your sentences are perfect. 0-

0 Thanks, Neeraj and Optilang.02br
02br
00Optilang, Is dissatisfied not suitable in this context? out of place? 0-

0Just doesn't sound 100% to me in this context. I wouldn't say it it was wrong.0-

0Thanks, Optilang.0-

<<>>

optilangthey felt obligated to reply and they were dissatisfied for not getting paid for overtime.

Here is the thinking logic:
Answering a phone call during after hours is unlikely to be considered working and therefore can't not be considered as "o.t.
Many times in the past, my pager went off and If I didn't feel like answe

N2G, it's not at all bad and completely understandable. I'm at the point where I'm nit-picking now. That's good progress!

1) I would not use "for" - they are not getting paid overtime.

2) I don't love "According to them" but I don't have a good alternative, other than simply saying "They claim that they feel obligated."

3) Are they joining together in one class-action l

Thank you, GG. I really need comments like these. I still have problems with prepositions.

Regarding the lawsuit question, I don't know which is more natural for employees to do. Do employees normally file a joint lawsuit through their labor unions? Maybe yes since it sounds like a big lawsuit which is beyond affordable for an average employee.