0
Snuppelina Posted 13 years ago
Grammar
overall view
Can I say an "overall view of a spectrometer"?
There is a real picture of a spectrometer in Fig. 1, what should I call it ?
There is a real picture of a spectrometer in Fig. 1, what should I call it ?
Top answer
If you mean the caption, "Spectrometer". Note that captions normally do not take closing punctuation. If you are wondering how to reference it in the text, say that figure 1 is a picture of a spectrometer.
- If you mean the caption, "Spectrometer".
- Note that captions normally do not take closing punctuation.
- If you are wondering how to reference it in the text, say that figure 1 is a picture of a spectrometer.
- "Overall view" does not work.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
11 Answers
0
If you mean the caption, "Spectrometer". Note that captions normally do not take closing punctuation. If you are wondering how to reference it in the text, say that figure 1 is a picture of a spectrometer. "Overall view" does not work.
00
Thanks, totally agree.
I can perhaps say "The photograph of the spectrometer" (there is a real picture of it).
"in the frame of the presented procedure, the mass resolution appeared to occur about 8amu"
I think it's totally wrong, am I right? Should be something like "within the presented procedure". Any suggestions?
I can perhaps say "The photograph of the spectrometer" (there is a real picture of it).
"in the frame of the presented procedure, the mass resolution appeared to occur about 8amu"
I think it's totally wrong, am I right? Should be something like "within the presented procedure". Any suggestions?
00
snuppelinaI can perhaps say "The photograph of the spectrometer" (there is a real picture of it).That's fine.
snuppelina"in the frame of the presented procedure, the mass resolution appeared to occur about 8amu" I think it's totally wrong, am I right? Should be something like "within the presented procedure". Any suggestions?
00
It is not surprising that such rather inconsistent procedure of mass reconstruction gives biased values of the parameters. For instance, in the frame of the presented procedure, the mass resolution was estimated to be approximately 8 amu.
00
If I understand that:
It is not surprising that this rather inconsistent procedure for mass reconstruction yields biased values for the parameters. For instance, using the presented procedure, the mass resolutio
It is not surprising that this rather inconsistent procedure for mass reconstruction yields biased values for the parameters. For instance, using the presented procedure, the mass resolutio
00
One more question.:-)
The mass resolution for X was estimated to be approximately 8 amu, while the mass resolution estimated, following the measurements with monochromatic ions, did not exceed 3.3 amu.
The mass resolution for X was estimated to be approximately 8 amu, while the mass resolution estimated, following the measurements with monochromatic ions, did not exceed 3.3 amu.
00
I mean hat the mass resolution followed from the measurements with monochromatic ions did not exceed...
00
snuppelinaOne more question.:-)One more? I don't believe that. And I think you made up monochromatic ions.
snuppelinaThe mass resolution for X was estimated to be approximately 8 amu, while the mass resolution estimated, following the measurements with monochromatic ions, did not exceed 3.3 amu.I'm not sure I understand th
00
0
No. It is vague, because I do not know what was done, exactly. A more specific verb would be better.
0
Related Questions