0
Tinanam0102 Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Or so

Hi teachers,

The Taliban posed a threat to the governments of Afghanistan and Pakistan, but was not capable of directly striking the people of America - or so it was widely thought.

1. Does that mean "The Taliban was not capable of directly striking the people of American, which is at some point/ roughly widely believed"?

2. Can "or so" be placed after "....widely thought"?

Thank you.

Tinanam
  

Top answer

tinanam0102 The Taliban posed a threat to the governments of Afghanistan and Pakistan, but was not capable of directly striking the people of America - or so it was widely thought. 1. Does that mean "The Taliban was not capable of directly striking the people of American, which is at some point/ roughly widely believed"?

  • tinanam0102 The Taliban posed a threat to the governments of Afghanistan and Pakistan, but was not capable of directly striking the people of America - or so it was widely thought.
  • 1.
  • Does that mean "The Taliban was not capable of directly striking the people of American, which is at some point/ roughly widely believed"?
  • Close.
  • not capable of directly striking the people of America.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
tinanam0102The Taliban posed a threat to the governments of Afghanistan and Pakistan, but was not capable of directly striking the people of America - or so it was widely thought.
1. Does that mean "The Taliban was not capable of directly striking the people of American, which is at some point/ roughly widely believed"?
Close.
... not capable of
0
Hi CalifJim,

Thank you for your help. I'd like to ask this question
CalifJimThis construction is used to hint that what was believed may have been wrong.

Compare:Jane was supposed to meet them at 3 o'clock, or so they believed.(Jane was supposed to meet them at 3 o'clock. Or, to be more precise, they believed that Jane was supposed to meet them at 3 o'c
0
tinanam01021. Do you mean the construction for my question was "what people believe that directly striking the people of American was not possible may have been wrong."? In the piece of this writing, when I read on, I see the examples of attacks carried out, which are contrary to the believe most people thought.
I don't quite understand your question. I was
0
Hi CalifJim,

Thank you very much for all these questions.

Tinanam

Related Questions