0
Tung Quoc Posted 20 years ago
Grammar

or (case particulier)

Please read:

There is something called notional agreement where the two alternatives combined with either and or together , as it were, make a plural even though they are separate entities. In that case - Either the mother or the father are going to have to look after the child is acceptable because the two together albeit at different times are going to have to look after the child. Put another way one doesn't really exclude the other. But- Either a quick decision or a postponement is required in this situation calls out for a singular verb as one of the choices excludes the other. (From Mr.Alan, English teacher)

So,

1/ Either she or I is/are going to have to decide.

2/Vietnam, Laos or Cambodia was/were a member of Indochina.

3/Al Gore or George Bush was/were the President of the USA.

For these 3 sentences, you will choose the singular form or the plural form? Or both are correct? Why?

Quoc
  

Top answer

1/ Either she or I am going to have to decide. 2/Vietnam, Laos or Cambodia was a member of Indochina. 3/Al Gore or George Bush was the President of the USA.

  • 1/ Either she or I am going to have to decide.
  • 2/Vietnam, Laos or Cambodia was a member of Indochina.
  • 3/Al Gore or George Bush was the President of the USA.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
1/ Either she or I am going to have to decide.

2/Vietnam, Laos or Cambodia was a member of Indochina.

3/Al Gore or George Bush was the President of the USA.
0
Either is a word that causes endless problems not only for writers but also sometimes for those who wish to guide them. The style manual for the London Times, for instance, states flatly that "neither takes a singular verb, e.g., 'Neither Bert nor Fred has any idea.'" That is true enough, to be sure, for examples involving Bert and Fred or any other two singular
0
Incho is replying about the negative form, which has already been discussed in another thread (even though he adds some interesting ideas); it's not really the point of Tung Quoc's question.
Here I agree with Yoong Liat. It's true that in some languages (including Italian) a double subject is considered plural even when joined by "or", while in English we consider that with "or" only one of

Related Questions