JungKim Why was it that inversion didn't occur, Inversion is not always mandatory; it is merely a common occurrence with some fronted adverbials.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
JungKimWhy was it that inversion didn't occur,Inversion is not always mandatory; it is merely a common occurrence with some fronted adverbials.
JungKim please let me know if you still think that 'only' there means 'but; however'.Ah, no; it means 'finally', to my mind.
JungKim do you mean you changed your mind about the meaning of "only" after watching the clip?Yes, from the intonation.
JungKim, however, the "only" is located right before "tonight", so I don't understand how the OP's "only" is the same type of "only" as in your example.I see no problem. Evidently, it is more frequently
JungKimAccording to your renewed interpretation, do you now think that inversion is in order in the OP?No.
JungKimIf not, please let me know how the "only" can be fronted without inversion in the OP?I don't think it can be with that meaning.
This comment of yours I do not agree with, and here's why:JungKim:, however, the "only" is located right before "tonight", so I don't understand how the OP's "only" is the same type of "only" as in your example.Mister MicawberI see no problem. Evidently, it is more frequently before verbs.