It requires a full stop, breaking the sentence into two, but I suppose breaking the sentence up has its merits.
Is this OK?
Does 'but' join the main clause to the right to 1) the participle phrase on the left or 2) to everything on the left?
Also, is 'but rather' superfluous?
It is not a tactic of the race car driver to pit early, but rather an unfortunate mishap.
I often see it used as such, but wouldn't but on its own work fine?
Thanks
English 1b3 It requires a full stop, breaking the sentence into two, but I suppose breaking the sentence up has its merits. Is this OK? Yes, but I prefer "...
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
English 1b3Yes, but I prefer "... breaking up the sentence ...".
It requires a full stop, breaking the sentence into two, but I suppose breaking the sentence up has its merits.
Is this OK?
English 1b3Does 'but' join the main clause to the right to 1) the participle phrase on the left or 2) to everyt
English 1b3This doesn't seem right. It would need to be "instead it is ...", and I think the punctuation may need adjusting too, otherwise there's a whiff of a
What about using 'instead' rather than 'but rather'?
It is not a tactic of the race car driver to pit early, instead an unfortunate mishap.
English 1b3
This doesn't seem right. It would need to be "instead it is ...",
Just as I thought. This means, therefore, that instead must not be used as a conjunction, but (rather) as a conjunctive adverb, correct?